Feedback

X

Leave Comment

SERIES: Liberty Head Three Cent Nickels 1865-1889
LEVEL: Year, MintMark, & Major Variety

1887/6 3CN Strong Overdate (Proof)

View All Coin Images

PCGS PR67

OVERDATE COMPARISON

PCGS PR66
PCGS #:
3784
Diameter:
17.90 millimeters
Designer:
James Barton Longacre
Weight:
1.94 grams
Edge:
Plain
Mintage:
Metal Content:
75% Copper, 25% Nickel
Auction Record:
$6,047 • NGC PR65 • 10-2-2000 • Ira & Larry Goldberg
Go To Grade
  • 25
  • 35
  • 40
  • 45
  • 50
  • 55
  • 58
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 62+
  • 63
  • 63+
  • 64
  • 64+
  • 65
  • 65+
  • 66
  • 66+
  • 67
Rarity and Survival Estimates (Explain)
Grades Survival
Estimate 
Numismatic
Rarity 
Relative Rarity
By Type 
Relative Rarity
By Series 
All Grades 1,750 R-4.7 15 / 26 15 / 26
60 or Better 1,650 R-4.7 15 / 26 TIE 15 / 26 TIE
65 or Better 800 R-5.4 15 / 26 TIE 15 / 26 TIE
Condition Census (Explain) Show more rows
Pos Grade Thumbnail Pedigree and History
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade
Condition Census (Explain) Show fewer rows
Pos Grade Thumbnail Pedigree and History
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
1 PR67 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade
5 PR66 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade  
5 PR66 PCGS grade  

Ron Guth: Apparently, all of the 1887 Three Cent Nickel dies were overdated from 1886.  It is possible that dies dated 1886 were left over from production in 1886 then reused, but it could be possible that the engraver of the Proof dies started making the 1887 Proof dies with a simple mistake.  Since the dies for each year's production were made at the end of the previous year, it is natural that the engraver could forget that he was producing dies for 1887 in 1886, and simply grab the old 1886 date punch.  This appears to be the case for the multiple dies used to produce Proof Three-Cent Nickels for 1887.  Once the mistake was realized, some effort was made to efface the error by grinding (or polishing) the dies, but based on the evidence of the coins themselves, this appears to be a hit-and-miss effort.  What we have today are two different varieites known as the Strong Overdate and the Weak Overdate.  True to their names, the Weak Overdate has barely visible remnants of an underlying 6 and the Strong Overdate has a rather sharp 6 underneath the 7.  Collectors value these varieties differently and the Strong Overdate usually commands a premium over the Weak Overdate variety.

The total populations of the two varieties are nearly identical, though the Strong Overdate has a slight edge.  Cameo examples are very rare and, here, the Weak Overdate is almost four times as rare as the Strong Overdate.  Deep Came examples of either variety may be non-existent.  Neither variety is known above PR67.